Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice to your legal rights from the parties, arising out of the over marriage of your couple, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents with the boy or Female tend not to approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they can Reduce off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner along with private respondents and will consider care of all of the elements of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Generally speaking, higher courts do not have direct oversight over the decrease courts of record, in that they cannot attain out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the decreased courts.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be attained, the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. Read more
For those who find an error during the written content of the published opinion (like a misspelled name or perhaps a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, it is also a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to perform away with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case regulation within a particular court. Indeed, Every single circuit has its very own set of binding case legislation. Therefore, a judgment rendered while in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding from the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
Problems or Errors When you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a poor link or maybe a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Middle.
Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and get more info regulatory law, which are set up by executive organizations based on statutes.